Why is it we have to wait until someone becomes ill and then try to “fix it” after it is broken instead of preventing the spread of illnesses or solving the spread of illnesses after there was exposure in a cost effective manner. Which costs more to the establishment during real time or lawsuits and overall the taxpayers? For example: I have a friend who got Staph infection while in the hospital and is now paralyzed. She has been in there over 6 months and will now have to go to Rehab. I had approached this same hospital with cost effective equipment that will kill Staph, MRSA, Viruses, and some Flu’s in the air and on surfaces, and reduce energy costs and chemical use at the same time. They said my equipment was not needed. However, they spend over $12 Million on an atrium. Prevention or Fixing after it is broke? What do you think?
Windows Live Hotmail
Advertisement
